Democrat in
Missouri to Oppose Health Care Law
Published: April 11, 2011 - New York Times
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Missourifs Democratic attorney general broke with his
party on Monday and urged a federal judge to invalidate the central provision of
the new health care law.
The filing of the court brief by Attorney General Chris Koster, a onetime
Republican state legislator who switched to the Democratic
Party in 2007, underscores the actfs political tenuousness in a critical
Midwestern swing state.
Mr. Kosterfs action followed months of pressure from state Republicans that
he join attorneys general from other states who are challenging the
constitutionality of the law.
Rather than join the litigation, however, Mr. Koster chose to file a gfriend
of the courth
brief, or legal argument, in the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in
Atlanta, which is reviewing one of five challenges to the act that have moved
into the midlevel appellate courts.
Three lower court judges have upheld the law, while two have ruled that its
central provision — the requirement that most Americans obtain insurance — is
unconstitutional.
The 11th Circuit is hearing a case filed in Pensacola, Fla., by Republican
governors and attorneys general from 26 states. The federal district judge in
that case, Roger Vinson, decreed that the entire health care act should be
invalidated, but stayed his ruling until the Supreme
Court settled the matter.
In Missouri, a ballot referendum aimed at nullifying the law was approved by
nearly three to one last year, and the state legislature recently passed
resolutions urging Mr. Koster to join legal challenges. The statefs lieutenant
governor, a Republican, filed a lawsuit last year seeking to block the law.
In a letter sent to the Republican leaders of the state legislature
announcing his decision to oppose the law, Mr. Koster acknowledged that the
legislative resolutions, though nonbinding, were gimpactful, as they give voice
to the political will of Missourians.h
Although he supported expansion of health coverage, he wrote, his duty is gto
the law, and not to a political outcome.h
Though Mr. Koster has been slow to weigh in, he did not mince words, arguing
in the brief that Congress had overstepped its authority by mandating that
individuals purchase health insurance, which he called ga substantial blow to
federalism and personal freedom.h
gIf Congress can force activity under the Commerce Clause, then it could
force individuals to receive vaccinations or annual check-ups, undergo mammogram
or prostate exams, or maintain a specific-body mass,h he wrote.
He asked that the mandate be stripped out of the law, and that the rest of it
be allowed to remain in effect.
His central argument echoed those made by plaintiffs in a number of the
lawsuits, but it was noteworthy coming from a Democrat. The only Democratic
state official who has joined the litigation as a plaintiff, Attorney General
Buddy Caldwell of Louisiana, switched to the Republican
Party in February.
For Mr. Koster, who was elected in 2008, the decision to oppose his party on
such a high-profile issue reflects the political challenges for Missouri
Democrats in the coming election cycle.
Though this state has long been viewed as a political bellwether, the
politics of the electorate have grown more conservative in recent years and President
Obama narrowly lost the state.
Mr. Koster, who is up for re-election next year along with the statefs two
top Democrats, Gov. Jay Nixon and Senator Claire McCaskill, has already faced
questions about his political loyalties.
Known as a Republican moderate, he became a Democrat just months before
announcing his candidacy for attorney general, succeeding despite criticism of
the move from both parties, including being pinned with the nickname gKoster the
Imposter.h